Pomo
May
2008
The weekend conference on re: reading the postmodern was a Canadian Literature Symposium at Ottawa U, for those who don’t know that. Robert Stacey (pictured wrapping up the talks) chaired the events with almost 40 speakers giving papers and 3 public readings with some of the best poets locally and nationally.
I went in with only a vague sketch of what postmodern is. It is a contested term with a lot of people standing under the banner like any broad term that’s been bandied about for years, in this case, for about 30-50 years depending on what you count.
There are common characteristics that keep being referenced. From what I gathered:
- It’s a way of thinking and communicating more than a time period. As Christian Bok put it, some of the best Victorian writing that’s ever been written is being written today in Canada. That was tongue poked in cheek but true ’nuff. This is not the Victorian era. It’s not the postmodern era either in a way. Postmodern is a continuation of modern literature, or is a radical departure from it, depending on who you ask.
- Postmodern (pomo) deals with margins, with that which is left out of mainstream, the data that doesn’t fit. It is resistance to the polished close, the one story and the “click” of closure.
- Pomo is a reaction to mainstream and to common history. It takes common history and tried to subvert it with new angles and new mashups. For being a reaction it is dependant on there being a common narrative to react to.
- Although it speaks of dealing with marginalized people, this largely ends up meaning women and immigrants, although there was a homogenous prevailingly white anglo crowd. Sort of like Canadian politics, what gets called left and right are pretty close to middle.
- Pomo is about ironic telling, uses humor and absurdist twists and may not show its hand on which is playing it straight and which is satire.
- Pomo is about personal narrative to describe a local area or a nation thru the lens of one person’s direct experience in minutae.
- In pomo text is a toy like lego. It takes text and recontextualizes the components to mess with it and see what new understandings arise.
- Pomo aims to make the reader or listener draw one’s own conclusions rather than tell a moral story. It wants to step back from the idea of authority in telling a “truth” and let there be many truths.
- It aims to break up linear storytelling and shake up the relationship of information hierarchically given to a receptive passive audience rather like the 4th wall in theatre.
- It aims to make visible how any perception is a construction and how any judgement is a construction and not reality itself. It aims to destabilize this idea of a pat history that can be labelled and known. Or as Herb Wylie put it, “There is more than one way to skin a past.”
Now that I’ve grokked the broad brushstrokes I can get into more detail. Amanda and rob already gave some synopsis of the weekend events.








